I think this can be closed. Looking good without the systemd script. On Mon, May 1, 2023 at 4:29 PM Diederik de Haas <didi.deb...@cknow.org> wrote:
> On Monday, 1 May 2023 20:40:11 CEST Rusty Grove wrote: > > The script is something I did > > Can you test without that script then? > IMO the proper way to deal with suspend/resume should be done by the > system/ > kernel and it *could* be that your script is actually interfering with > that. > > > I'm not quite sure what you mean by the sequence being in reverse... > > if you do in pre: > unload A > unload B > > Then you should do in post: > load B > load A > > but your script did > load A > load B > > HTH -- Confidentiality Notice: The material transmitted herein is intended only for the use of the addressee and may contain information that constitutes work product or is confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. Distribution or copying of this communication or reliance upon its contents by unauthorized participants is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by telephone or email.
