On Fri, Jun 16, 2023 at 01:29:28PM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 10:50:34AM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> >
> > My take would be to mark it as unsupported after the trixie development
> > cycle
> > has started (this flags awareness, but has no impact on stable releases)
> > and then revisit the support situation before the trixie freeze (Kea might
> > be
> > a full replacment by then or maybe it turns out the patch support is ensured
> > despite upstream's EOL)
> >
> Hi Moritz,
>
> Now that bookworm is out and (AFAICT) that the trixie development cycle
> has started, are able to go ahead with marking isc-dhcp as unsupported?
Ultimately it's the maintainer(s) call, but sounds good to me.
Cheer,
Moritz
