On 07 juil. 2023 10:10, Helmut Grohne <hel...@subdivi.de> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Jul 07, 2023 at 09:46:39AM +0200, Christian Marillat wrote:
>> Severity: serious
>
> I believe that this is the wrong severity for this bug and it should be
> downgraded. As I am not otherwise involved with this package, I'll leave
> that up to maintainer and/or release team.

>From Debian policy 7.2 :

,----
| "Recommends"
|    This declares a strong, but not absolute, dependency.
| 
|    The "Recommends" field should list packages that would be found
|    together with this one in all but unusual installations.
`----

For now libheif1 without the right plugin is unusable.

>> For people like me with Install-Recommends set to false,
>> no plugins are installed and I spend some time to understand why
>> program like didikam, thunar or imagemagick was unable to display any
>> .heic image files.
>
> I think this is working as intended. As a shared library, libheif1 tends
> to be pulled into lots of dependency trees. For instance navit
> transitively depends on it without there being a need for heif plugins.
> You can also use gimp in lots of ways in the absence of heif plugins. We
> typically cannot turn the dependency of this (often unused) shared
> library into a recommendation, but we can minimize the impact of that
> dependency by moving the plugins to a different package. That's what is
> being done here.

I see nothing in teh Debian policy sating that we need to minimize dependecies.

>> Total size for all plugins is really small 384K
>> 
>> The library itself is 648K
>> 
>> Please remove these plugins packages and restore as it was before in 1.15.1-1
>
> Would you rather consider enabling the installation of recommended
> packages?

A joke ?

Christian

Reply via email to