On 2023-07-06 Helmut Grohne <hel...@subdivi.de> wrote: > Source: p11-kit [...] > - [AC_RUN_IFELSE( > + [AC_CACHE_CHECK([strerror_r return > value],[ac_cv_strerror_r_ret],[ > + AC_RUN_IFELSE( > [AC_LANG_SOURCE([[ > #include <errno.h> > #include <string.h> > @@ -178,10 +179,13 @@ > return strerror_r (EINVAL, buf, 32); > } > ]])], > + [ac_cv_strerror_r_ret=xsi], > + [ac_cv_strerror_r_ret=gnu], > + [ac_cv_strerror_r_ret=cross])]) > + dnl Guess that we cross build on glibc > + AS_IF([test "$ac_cv_strerror_r_ret" = xsi], > [AC_DEFINE([HAVE_XSI_STRERROR_R], 1, [Whether > XSI-compliant strerror_r() is available])], > - [AC_DEFINE([HAVE_GNU_STRERROR_R], 1, [Whether > GNU-specific strerror_r() is available])], > - [])], > - []) > + [AC_DEFINE([HAVE_GNU_STRERROR_R], 1, [Whether > GNU-specific strerror_r() is available])])])
> AC_CACHE_CHECK([for thread-local storage class], > [ac_cv_tls_keyword], Hello Helmut, thanks. I guess this should read AS_IF([test "$ac_cv_strerror_r_ret" = cross], instead of AS_IF([test "$ac_cv_strerror_r_ret" = xsi], ? Also wouldn't using AC_FUNC_STRERROR_R be a better fix? (I do not expect you to provide this, I asking for your opinion) TIA, cu Andreas -- `What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His other friends are so grateful to you.' `I sew his ears on from time to time, sure'
