Hi Dima, * Dima Kogan <dko...@debian.org> [2023-07-12 11:37]:
Hello. I'm using the package from bookworm. rosbashThe "rosbash" package should provide several commandline tools, documented here: http://wiki.ros.org/rosbash But only "rosrun" is provided in the package. This is because most of the tools are not binaries, but are shell functions. These are supposed to be defined in /usr/share/rosbash/rosbash, but our rosbash package does not ship this file. This file exists in the package sources in tools/rosbash/rosbash, but it is not installed anywhere. This is the bug. Our package does reference the tools (we include all the tab completions). And the package scripts ask for it: dima@fatty:$ source /usr/share/rosbash/catkin_env_hook/15.rosbash.bash bash: /usr/share/rosbash/rosbash: No such file or directory So if we install that file, that would probably fix this bug.
The file is installed as: /usr/share/bash-completion/completions/rosbashSo we could adopt the path in 15.rosbash.bash. But I wonder if we should rather source that file by default. Up to 1.15.8-1 (buster) rosbash installed that file into /etc/bash_completion.d/rosbash and it was sourced automatically when bash-completion was activated. In 1.15.8-1 this was changed to /usr/share.. because the /etc patch is deprecated (afair) but bash-completion does not source those files automatically anymore.
The only option I found is adding a link in /etc/profile.d/.for fish, tcsh and zsh the respective files are sourced automatically already, so we should probably remove the corresponding catkin_env_hooks.
Btw. ros-noetic-rosbash contains: /opt/ros/noetic/share/rosbash/catkin_env_hook/15.rosbash.* and /opt/ros/noetic/etc/catkin/profile.d/15.rosbash.* But I'm not sure when either are used, does someone know? Cheers Jochen
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature