Hi,

Reply follows inline.  Can we move this discussion to #1016558 to not
bother Axel with our discussion?

Manphiz <manp...@gmail.com> writes:

> Nicholas D Steeves <nstee...@gmail.com> writes:
>>>> Nicholas D Steeves <nstee...@gmail.com> writes:
>>>>
> Thanks!  Though I'm not really a user of muse-el, I'd like to keep it in
> a good shape as an exercise as an Emacs addon maintainer.  It looks like
> there is not too much work thanks to Elisp being a fairly stable
> language :)

That's fine, thank you once again for adopting it, and yes, generally
everything is ok :)

>>> [1] https://salsa.debian.org/emacsen-team/muse-el/-/merge_requests/3
>>
> Thanks for the tips!  I checked the Debian Policy Upgrading Checklist[1]
> and agreed with Debian Janitor on the "no changes are needed" bit.  And
> to avoid having to wait for the bot to do the rebase I've manually
> resolved the conflicts and rebased my MR on top of it as well.
>

You're welcome, and good call.

>> Let me know when your done, and we can talk about the next steps.
>
> Now all MRs are merged.  Please advise the next steps.  Thanks!
>

Wonderful!  I also see you have a GPG key now.  Have you generated
revocations certificates yet?

  https://wiki.debian.org/Keysigning#Step_2:_Generate_a_revocation_certificate

Next, where can I find your key?  I'm assuming that you're committed to
maintaining this identity for the foreseeable future, and that you'd
like to build reputation for future involvement in Debian.  It's not
required at the stage you're at, but it's recommended.

  https://wiki.debian.org/Keysigning#Step_3:_Make_your_public_key_public

The subkey that I was able to download didn't include any identities.

Other than that, this package isn't quite ready to upload, because there
are three unaddressed lintian warnings.

  https://wiki.debian.org/Lintian

Best,
Nicholas

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to