Hi. Kurt Hornik writes ("Debian PR #1042889"): > Have you seen > <https://bugs.launchpad.net/vm/+bug/1979048> > ?
No. > This points to a branch of VM at > <https://code.launchpad.net/~markd-kermodei/vm/vm-emacs-28> > which apparently at some point in time passed native compilation (I > never got a chance to try to far). Interesting! > I can try to follow up with Uday Reddy and Mark Diekhans to try merging > the native compilation fixes into the main branch (at least). That would be great. > Afaict, part of the problem was Emacs 29 not being out when this was > reported, and Emacs 28 having native compilation off by default but on > for the Debian packages. In any case, Emacs 29 is out now, so I guess > time to ask again. Thanks for the info. With my Debian maintainer hat on, I don't think I ought to be fishing some random branch out of launchpad and shipping it to Debian's users, without a fairly thorough review. (Also, it's in bzr!) So I think I need to fix #1042889 by disabling byte-compilation, pending a better resolution (ideally, upstream). PS: Was there a reason you didn't send your message to the Debian ticket #1042889 ? I think it's generally a good idea to do these things in public. Unless you tell me not to, I will forward your message (and this one) to the bug - so please let me know if you object for any reason. Regards, Ian. -- Ian Jackson <ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk> These opinions are my own. Pronouns: they/he. If I emailed you from @fyvzl.net or @evade.org.uk, that is a private address which bypasses my fierce spamfilter.