On Sat, 12 Aug 2023 14:54:16 +0200, Baptiste Beauplat wrote: > > Checking for "deprecated" (on upstream websites which document > > functions) or "replaced (by|with)" doesn't make any sense IMO … > > Please just remove tese tests … > First, I agree with you, "replaced (by|with)" and "deprecated" are too > generic not to trigger false positives. I'll be removing them from the > list.
Excellent! I guess that solves most of my grievances with duck. > Secondly, even if, as stated by the check certainty, the suggestion is > at most a wild-guess, I would like to keep the test as it can still be > useful to catch deprecated projets or links that moved on to another > page. However, I want to have a way for users to filter the checks > based on certainty. I'll be adding an option for that both in the cli > arguments and the configuration file. Although, I'll keep the default > to show all checks. Sounds good as well. > Finally, the checks for obsoletes sites is currently at a certainty of > wild-guess. I'll be bumping that to possible as, to the contrary of the > parked test, its a list of well known deprecated sites, and virtually > has no chance of false positive. I guess that makes sense for well-known obsolete sites. Thanks for maintaining and improving duck! Cheers, gregor -- .''`. https://info.comodo.priv.at -- Debian Developer https://www.debian.org : :' : OpenPGP fingerprint D1E1 316E 93A7 60A8 104D 85FA BB3A 6801 8649 AA06 `. `' Member VIBE!AT & SPI Inc. -- Supporter Free Software Foundation Europe `-
signature.asc
Description: Digital Signature
