On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 11:11 +0300, Eugeniy Meshcheryakov wrote: > 23 ???????????? 2006 ?? 09:57 +0200 Frank Küster ??????????????(-????): > > Eugeniy Meshcheryakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > So, I cannot reproduce the bug here (but maybe because I use > > > 'unstable'?). > > > > Maybe (note that I'm using unstable's teTeX), or because you're using a > > different ghostscript; here, gs points to gs-esp.
Sarge, hence gs-esp version 7.07 I guess. Or have you backported GS? > % ls -l /etc/alternatives/gs > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 15 2006-04-07 19:17 /etc/alternatives/gs -> > /usr/bin/gs-esp In unstable, gs-esp is version 8.15 or so. The step from v7 to v8 was very important for the quality of PDF. I get here (with gs pointing to gs-gpl version 8.01) identical results from pdflatex and from latex+ dvips+ps2pdf. The only error in the bookmarks that I can see is 'N' and 'n' instead of the proper 'Eng' and 'eng' (or 'Ng' and 'ng') glyphs. But that happens with both routes and may well be a font issue. How about forwarding this patch upstream? I think Heiko is better equiped than we to judge all the fine details here. cheerio ralf
