On Tue, 15 Aug 2023 at 07:40:58 +0200, Torbjörn Andersson wrote: > > if there is a version or replacement that targets SDL 2 > > SDL_sound 2 [1] uses SDL 2, apparently. I don't know how widely used it is, > but I think it's needed for AGS [2] at least.
I don't intend to package SDL_sound 2 myself (I'm concentrating on the extensions that are part of https://github.com/libsdl-org/) but if someone else (maybe you?) would like to package and maintain SDL_sound version 2.x, doing so in https://salsa.debian.org/sdl-team/ would make sense. I imagine the relationship between sdl-sound1.2 and libsdl2-sound should be similar to sdl-mixer1.2 and libsdl2-mixer, so this bug report would still be "won't fix" and the SDL-2-based version should be a separate source package. Thanks, smcv