Manphiz <manp...@gmail.com> writes:

> Nicholas D Steeves <s...@debian.org> writes:
>> Manphiz <manp...@gmail.com> writes:
>>> Nicholas D Steeves <s...@debian.org> writes:
>>>> Manphiz <manp...@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>> You're welcome.  Yes, I agree that the github fork's structure has
>> diverged less, and I vaguely remember that that may have been one of the
>> reasons why I chose to watch it for future releases, but the then tag
>> never materialised.  As noted previously, I'm ok with switching to the
>> fork if that's what you'd prefer to do long-term!  As the maintainer you
>> get to pick the most high-quality and well-maintained upstream for the
>> Debian source, because you're the one who is responsible to our users.
>>
>
> Sounds good.  I'll give it a little more thoughts.

Wonderful, there's no rush.  As ever, in Debian, you don't need to do
something you don't want to do.

>> Do you mind if I enhance this significantly?  Find proposal in-line, at
>> the end of the email.
>
> No problem!  Patch applied, rebuilt, and reuploaded to mentors[1].
> PTAL.

LGTM!

>> Also, I'd like this to be more visible, so I'll
>> file a bug titled something like "Choose living upstream for muse-el,
>> and merge updates" if you don't.  I'm vaguely starting to remember that
>> the issue about a future upstream was raised during my early
>> contributions, but then I forgot all about it ;) Also, as the fixes for
>> Emacs compat eventually start accumulating we'll end up becoming a
>> second fork.
>>
>
> Makes sense.  Filed Bug#1051247 for tracking.  Will probably get to it
> in the next revision.

Much obliged.

Please refinalise with 'dch -r' and commit with something like "Actually
release 3.20+dfsg-8 to unstable" (or sid, as you prefer!).  Then push.
Please create an annotated tag called "debian/3.20+dfsg-8", but don't
push that tag until you receive the "ACCEPTED" email from
ftp-masters/the archive.  It will most likely be less than 24h in
between pushing the release commit and pushing the tag, during which
time you'll be waiting for me to actually make the upload.

As for why?  Well, there's some ambiguity now about whether
commit:02e95c1 was 3.20+dfsg-8, the fix is easy, and the delay is only
another day or two.

After this, the package is truly ready.
Cheers,
Nicholas

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to