> This is also being used in src:explosive-c4 now and the approach breaks > cross compilation. Please stop doing this, we'll have to touch all of > these. > > Still the use case is real and we need a better way to build packages > with qmake6. I was talking with Sune and Lisandro on IRC and their > consensus seems to have been that qtchooser and QT_SELECT are dead and > should not be used for Qt6. They suggested that we add add a new > --buildsystem to debhelper. We already have qmake_qt4 and qmake, why not > have qmake6? While changing QT_SELECT from qt5 to qt6 would be > convenient, changing it to "dh $@ --buildsystem qmake6" is easy enough, > no? The qmake6 build system can reuse qmake just like qmake_qt4 and > doing it that way immediately makes cross compilation just work (since > we already have <triplet>-qmake6). Lisandro requested naming it qmake6 > rather than qmake_qt6. Even though this breaks consistency with earlier > use in debhelper, the similarity to how upstream calls it more > important. > > Salvo and Alexandre, do you second this?
It would be fine by me, I hope it should be cleaner than how it was to go from
4 to 5.
--
Salvo Tomaselli
"Io non mi sento obbligato a credere che lo stesso Dio che ci ha dotato di
senso, ragione ed intelletto intendesse che noi ne facessimo a meno."
-- Galileo Galilei
https://ltworf.codeberg.page/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
