On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 01:50:08AM +0200, Michael Kerrisk wrote:
> 
> These changes won't go upstream.

"upstream" ignored my comments, for instance
(several years ago ;-)
 
> ===================================================================
> --- man4/console_codes.4        (revision 1266)
> +++ man4/console_codes.4        (working copy)
> @@ -395,7 +395,7 @@
>  left corner is (1,1).
>  .SH "COMPARISONS WITH OTHER TERMINALS"
>  Many different terminal types are described, like the Linux console,
> -as being `VT100-compatible'.  Here we discuss differences vbetween the
> +as being `VT100-compatible'.  Here we discuss differences between the
>  Linux console an the two most important others, the DEC VT102 and
>  .BR xterm (1).
>  .\"

This caught my eye, since console_codes contains several technical errors -
not just spelling.  For grins, note the whole context:

   CSI Sequences
       The xterm program (as of XFree86 3.1.2G) does not recognize  the  blink
       or  invisible-mode  SGRs.  Stock  X11R6  versions  do not recognize the
       color-setting SGRs.  All other  ECMA-48  CSI  sequences  recognized  by
       Linux are also recognized by xterm, and vice-versa.

       The  xterm program will recognize all of the DEC Private Mode sequences
       listed above, but none of the Linux private-mode sequences.   For  dis-
       cussion  of xterm's own private-mode sequences, refer to the Xterm Con-
       trol Sequences document by Edward Moy  and  Stephen  Gildea,  available
       with the X distribution.

"3.1.2G" happens to be a very old version - obsolete.
That particular version was cited for nontechnical reasons...

-- 
Thomas E. Dickey
http://invisible-island.net
ftp://invisible-island.net

Attachment: pgpUuGvUfUFZr.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to