Package: wine
Version: 9.0~repack-2
Severity: serious
The source package fail to build on armel and armhf with the following error.
programs/winedbg/info.c:356:27: error: unknown conversion type character ‘I’ in
format [-Werror=format=]
356 | dbg_printf("'0x%0*I64lld' is not a valid module address\n",
ADDRWIDTH, base);
| ^
programs/winedbg/info.c:356:20: error: too many arguments for format
[-Werror=format-extra-args]
356 | dbg_printf("'0x%0*I64lld' is not a valid module address\n",
ADDRWIDTH, base);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The build failures are available from
<URL: https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=wine >.
The issue seem to have been introduced in an upstream commit 2021-10-12:
commit 3a869c1f9ba8a35eb0781fc5cb0b6684a9a7960b
Author: Eric Pouech <eric.pou...@gmail.com>
Date: Tue Oct 12 18:10:58 2021 +0200
winedbg: Simplify some printing of addresses.
Signed-off-by: Eric Pouech <eric.pou...@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Julliard <julli...@winehq.org>
diff --git a/programs/winedbg/info.c b/programs/winedbg/info.c
index dc0e6591f1f..477438d83e3 100644
--- a/programs/winedbg/info.c
+++ b/programs/winedbg/info.c
@@ -284,7 +284,7 @@ void info_win32_module(DWORD64 base)
HeapFree(GetProcessHeap(), 0, im.modules);
if (base && !num_printed)
- dbg_printf("'0x%x%08x' is not a valid module address\n", (DWORD)(base
>> 32), (DWORD)b
ase);
+ dbg_printf("'0x%0*I64x' is not a valid module address\n", ADDRWIDTH,
base);
}
struct class_walker
I do not understand the printf() notation well enough to understand what
is wrong. According to printf(3) in glibc 2.36, the I flag was added in
glibc 2.2. Could it be a compiler error, that the compiler do not
understand this "new" flag?
--
Happy hacking
Petter Reinholdtsen
