Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On 14.02.24 02:10, VictorBW wrote:
Package: gcc
Version: 4:12.2.0-3
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: knodewaeee+debb...@gmail.com
Dear Maintainer,
I wanted to dynamically select registers for use in an inline assembly
statement, so I tried the questionmark conditional operator, as in this minimal
example:
namespace gpr {
volatile register int64_t r12 asm("r12");
volatile register int64_t r13 asm("r13");
...
asm volatile ("mov %0, blah" : "+r"((reg) ? gpr::r13 : gpr::r12));
please post the complete code example.
please also recheck with newer GCC versions (GCC 13, GCC 14) in newer
Debian development versions.
This generates an internal error:
$ g++ bug.cpp
during RTL pass: expand
bug.cpp: In function ‘void move(uint8_t, int64_t)’:
bug.cpp:11:47: internal compiler error: in expand_expr_addr_expr_1, at
expr.cc:8435
11 | asm volatile ("mov %0, blah" : "+r"((reg) ? gpr::r13 :
gpr::r12));
|
~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
g++ -freport-bug did not deem the bug reproducible, but godbolt.org produces
the following backtrace
0x264bdbc internal_error(char const*, ...)
???:0
0xa523e3 fancy_abort(char const*, int, char const*)
???:0
0xf62e6e expand_expr_real_1(tree_node*, rtx_def*, machine_mode,
expand_modifier, rtx_def**, bool)
???:0
0xf703ae store_expr(tree_node*, rtx_def*, int, bool, bool)
???:0
I expected:
Realistically, a proper compiler error
Optimistically, generation of appropriate branches
I will apply an alternative solution in the meantime, but the latter behaviour
would be very nice to have.
Perhaps other builtins also generate improper errors when used with a
conditional operator? (I have not tried)
First time Debian/GCC bugreport, please forgive any relevant blunders :)
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 12.5
APT prefers stable-updates
APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable-security'), (500,
'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386, arm64
