Hello, On Thu, Feb 08, 2024 at 11:13:51PM +0800, 賴建宇 wrote: > Hi Steve,
> I am working on upgrading the libgpiod version, so I also took time to > investigate this 64-bit time_t topic. > I noticed that the libgpiod2.symbols and libgpiod2t64.symbols are identical > in the debdiff file. I am wondering if it is necessary to rename this > package in this case. Please correct me if I miss anything. > Thanks for your great effort. This report explains: https://adrien.dcln.fr/misc/armhf-time_t/2024-02-03T09%3A18%3A00/compat_reports/libgpiod-dev/lfs_to_time_t/compat_report.html There are ABI changes that do not show up in the type signatures of C++ functions and therefore do not affect C++ symbol mangling. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer https://www.debian.org/ slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
