I agree with the conclusions drawn here, but feel that it's possibly 
worth making a stronger general statement that policy should never 
prevent the implementation of a well-considered simple solution. I would 
like some further analysis of Sam's proposal, though - I don't think 
there's any advantage in undoing the existing solution, but if it would 
work then it's maybe a more straightforward solution for any similar 
issues in future?

Reply via email to