Hi, top-posting and leaving quite some context because the main point of my message is to actually share your bug report to the release team. If I remember correctly, tracker.debian.org is not doing any fancy treatment. We are just turning some YAML into HTML: https://release.debian.org/britney/excuses.yaml
We copy the lines from "excuses" as-is so if you want to change the order here, it needs to happen on the britney side. Feel free to reassign this to release.debian.org or any other suitable package if you want. Have a nice day! On Fri, 22 Mar 2024, Guillem Jover wrote: > Currently when a package is blocked by a release-team block hint, that > appears at the end of the "Issues preventing migration" list, which > can easily be missed if there are also lots of autopkgtest issues, > (see the current dpkg tracker page). [...] > The block seems like the most important information there, because > even if everything else gets solved that still requires active action > by the release-team. So I think it would be better to place it as the > first item, also so that it does not get drown by autopkgtest entries > that can be many. Also perhaps the autopkgtest entries should be > nested? As in: > > ,--- > ∙ ∙ Status for autopkgtest: > ∙ ∙ ∙ ceilometer/blocked-on-ci-infra: i386: Ignored failure > ∙ ∙ ∙ chrony/4.5-1: amd64: Pass, arm64: Pass, armel: Regression or new test ♻ > (reference ♻), armhf: Regression or new test ♻ (reference ♻), i386: Pass, > ppc64el: Pass, s390x: Pass > ∙ ∙ ∙ dash/0.5.12-6: amd64: Pass, arm64: Pass, armel: Regression or new test > ♻ (reference ♻), armhf: Regression or new test ♻ (reference ♻), i386: Pass, > ppc64el: Pass, s390x: Pass > ∙ ∙ ∙ dpkg/1.22.6: amd64: Pass, arm64: Pass, armel: Pass, armhf: Pass, i386: > Pass, ppc64el: Pass, s390x: Pass > ∙ ∙ ∙ gsocket/1.4.41-1: amd64: Pass, arm64: Pass, armel: Regression or new > test ♻ (reference ♻), armhf: Regression or new test ♻ (reference ♻), i386: > Pass, ppc64el: Pass, s390x: Pass > ∙ ∙ ∙ lintian/2.117.0: amd64: Regression or new test ♻ (reference ♻), arm64: > Regression or new test ♻ (reference ♻), armel: Regression or new test ♻ > (reference ♻), armhf: Regression or new test ♻ (reference ♻), i386: > Regression or new test ♻ (reference ♻), ppc64el: Regression or new test ♻ > (reference ♻), s390x: Regression or new test ♻ (reference ♻) > `--- > > Which would remove repetition and make it visually easier to see? > > (This has come up recently, I think multiple times, as I've got multiple > private queries, and some public ones, where it looks like people missed > the main reason for why dpkg is not migrating.) > > (Also as an aside, perhaps autopkgtest entries that are all-pass, > should appear in the “Additional info” part instead?) > > Thanks, > Guillem > -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Raphaël Hertzog <hert...@debian.org> ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋ The Debian Handbook: https://debian-handbook.info/get/ ⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ Debian Long Term Support: https://deb.li/LTS
