Control: tags -1 confirmed

Hi Benjamin

On 2024-02-14 21:01:40 +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> On 2024-02-14 14:48:49 -0500, Benjamin Barenblat wrote:
> > I’d like to alter this transition request. Instead of transitioning to
> > version 20230802, I’d like to transition to version 20240116, which
> > upstream recently released.
> > 
> > Is that okay? If so, I’ll upload 20240116 to experimental and reexamine
> > reverse dependencies. If not, please let me know how to proceed; a
> > 20230802 -> 20240116 upgrade would require a second transition, and I
> > don’t want to create extra work.
> That's okay. There is enough time to prepare a tranistion to 20240116
> until we have finished the time_t transition.

Since the version in unstable fails to build on armel and armhf and
blocks the time_t transition, but the version in experimental builds
fine, let's do this transition now.

With the upload to unstable, please check the FTBFS issue on risc64,
though. See

Sebastian Ramacher

Reply via email to