Hi David, On 29/04/24 at 07:25 -0600, David Bremner wrote: > > Control: severity -1 important > > > Source: racket > > Version: 8.12+dfsg1-7 > > Severity: serious > > Justification: FTBFS > > Tags: trixie sid ftbfs > > User: lu...@debian.org > > Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armel > > OK, I figured out why this doesn't show up on the buildd's: they don't > build the arch all packages on armel. For many years, armel hasn't been > able to build the documentation for racket, and it has been disabled > there. After some informal consultation with the release team I'm > downgrading this bug to non-RC. I'll work on having more clear > diagnostics for the build failure. > > I don't know how common this scenario is, but it might make sense to > restrict such rebuilds to arch:any on armel (and armhf), depending on > your goals of course.
Yeah, rebuilding arch:all in addition to arch:any was a mistake. I only filed bugs for packages that also have arch:any on armel, but obviously this wasn't enough to avoid all non-RC issues. Downgrading is of course fine. Lucas
