Control: close -1 256~rc2-1 On Fri, 3 May 2024 14:16:10 +0200 =?utf-8?Q?C=C3=A9dric?= Hannotier <[email protected]> wrote: > Dear Luca Boccassi, Dear Maintainers, > > On Sun, 28 Apr 2024 11:42:11 +0100 Luca Boccassi <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Sun, 28 Apr 2024 11:53:17 +0200 Adrien CLERC > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Package: systemd-resolved > > > Version: 255.5-1 > > > Severity: important > > > > > > Dear Maintainer, > > > > > > Since 255.5-1, resolvectl produces the following: > > > > > > ❯ resolvectl query --validate=yes www.youtube.com > > > www.youtube.com: resolve call failed: DNSSEC validation failed: no- > > signature > > > > > > The domain is unsigned. It worked in 255.4-1+b1, but I'm unable to > > rollback, > > > since it depends on libsystemd which makes a lot of package unhappy > > with > > > dependencies. > > > > > > Did I miss something? > > > In the meantime, I'll use "DNSSEC=no", but that's not a definitive > > answer. > > > > > > Have a nice day, > > > Adrien > > > > > > > There are no resolved patches downstream, report this upstream > > It has been resolved upstream [1] but need backporting for now. > I think commits to backports from upstream are: > d840783db5208219c78d73b9b46ef5daae9fea0a > 5237ffdf2b63a5afea77c3470d9981a2c29643cc > 414a9b8e5e1e772261b0ffaedc853f5c0aba5719
These are all in unstable and about to migrate to testing, closing -- Kind regards, Luca Boccassi
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
