Control: tags -1 -upstream Control: tags -1 wontfix Control: close -1 On Sun, 3 Mar 2024 01:14:03 +0100 Felix Jacobi <fe...@jacobi-bs.de> wrote: > In my opinion, it should be possible to use systemd-resolved along with > the original resolvconf again. This could re-allow using > systemd-resolved in cases, where the protocol specific identifiers are > relevant (in conjunction with a custom resolvconf hook). > > Maybe /usr/sbin/resolvconf could be managed with update-alternatives or > the symlink from /usr/sbin/resolvconf to resolvectl could be shipped in > a separate package?
Sorry, but the current setup is very much intentional. There is not going to be yet-another-package, and there is not going to be update- alternatives, which is an unholy mess. If you want to use sd-resolved, just don't bother with ifupdown - there is no reason to use that in 2024, for headless systems use networkd and for GUI systems use network-manager. -- Kind regards, Luca Boccassi
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
