On Tue, 23 Oct 2012 17:55:06 +0200 =?utf-8?B?TG/Dr2M=?= Minier
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Package: logcheck
> Version: 1.3.15
> Severity: minor
> Tags: patch
>
>         Hi,
>
> Got this log from time to time in System Events:
> Oct 23 13:48:16 pig2 named[28880]: success resolving 
> '26.0/25.218.183.203.in-addr.arpa/PTR' (in '0/25.218.183.203.in-addr.arpa'?) 
> after reducing the advertised EDNS UDP packet size to 512 octets
>
> Changing the regexp for the "(in '...'?)" part from:
> ^[[:alpha:]]{3} [ :[:digit:]]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ named\[[0-9]+\]: success 
> resolving '[^[:space:]]+' \(in '[.[:alnum:]-]+'\?\) after (disabling 
> EDNS|reducing the advertised EDNS UDP packet size to 512 octets)$
> to:
> ^[[:alpha:]]{3} [ :[:digit:]]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ named\[[0-9]+\]: success 
> resolving '[^[:space:]]+' \(in '[/.[:alnum:]-]+'\?\) after (disabling 
> EDNS|reducing the advertised EDNS UDP packet size to 512 octets)$
>


It's a shame no-one replied to this bug from 2012.

A lot has changed in that time, and eg EDNS is now more common- i do
remember seeing messages like this in the past, and adding locla
rules, but i  unless i am missing something i dont see these
messages at all in journal or bind.log today, so perhaps this bug can be closed.

 (i may well be missing something  - if these are in fact common then
we should definitely filter them as there's not much you can do!)

Reply via email to