severity 372208 wishlist Soeren Sonnenburg wrote:
Package: wpasupplicant Version: 0.5.3+20060522-1
If these patches are for the development version of wpa_supplicant, should they not be merged into upstream CVS, so that next time I take a snapshot, there is no need to carry along a large patch series?
Severity: normal
This is no defect, rather a wishlist item, IMHO.
wpasupplicant is missing a number of patches which can be found at: http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/wpa_supplicant/ for me personally most important is that one (which makes wep w/ orinoco based cards work again): wpa_supplicant-wep-key-fix.patch
Please provide a distinct bug report for that issue.
furthermore I applied: wpa_supplicant-assoc-timeout.patch wpa_supplicant-auth-fallback-v4.patch
Why?
I am not sure about the others: wpa_supplicant-0.4.8-madwifi-ioctl-reorder.patch wpa_supplicant-0.4.8-madwifi-privacy-invoked-fix.patch wpa_supplicant-ctrl-iface-ap-scan.patch wpa_supplicant-ctrl-iface-hide-keys.patch wpa_supplicant-driver-wext-debug.patch wpa_supplicant-ssid-len-fix.patch
What are they for? Why do I need to apply them? Have they been sent to Jouni?
Are you positive these bugs are for the 0.5 series of wpa_supplicant? If so, i would rather allow upstream to take care of them during their normal development process, unless they are _absolutely_ critical.
Kel. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]