On Sun, Dec 08, 2024 at 03:46:18PM +0100, наб wrote: > Fair cop; in the other bugs, Dickey says he uses it regularly; > so regularly in fact that he's also become the upstream > (and that's what I've packaged at > https://salsa.debian.org/debian/rcs-blame).
that sounds pretty sufficient to me! thanks for confirming it is
useful and sorry for having been a bit harsh in my initial mail.
> OTOH the popcon is looking awfully 0-y (while RCS's very much is not),
rcs's popcon is indeed, uhm, amazing.
> > I'm very happy about QA efforts in general, but some cleanups IMO achieve
> > the opposite of cleanup: they prevent removal of things which should be
> > cleaned up and removed.
> I don't disagree here (and the BOTD bugs tend to point out packages that
> do just want to be removed, that's like half of the RM queue rn).
I'm glad to hear this initiative causes so many removal bugs to be filed.
I guess I mostly see the "other side" of it, packages being salvaged and
some of them trigger me thinking "why oh why is that kept".
Thanks for these explainations and your qa work in the first place!
--
cheers,
Holger
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ OpenPGP: B8BF54137B09D35CF026FE9D 091AB856069AAA1C
⠈⠳⣄
wirklicher reichtum ist nicht privatjet fliegen, sondern sich vor dem schützen
können, was privatjet fliegen auslöst." <3 böhmermann am 3.2.23
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
