在 2025/1/8 05:51, Santiago Vila 写道: > El 7/1/25 a las 15:57, [email protected] escribió: >>> I don't think there is a way to force uploads for experimental to use >>> also experimental packages in the buildds. >> Thanks let I know this. >> But I don't very like this policy in experimental. >> IMHO, package upload to experimental should build use experimental first. > > The problem with that is that experimental has too many breaking packages > (i.e. packages which break other packages), so it is likely that many > packages would not build at all if all build-dependencies are taken > from experimental by default. > > Currently, experimental is used as a "staging area", so that people > can test, for example, sid + imagemagick7, or sid + python3.13, > or sid + gettext-0.23.1 as in this case, i.e. one thing at a time, > but not everything at the same time. Truely, this policy will make experimental test more fluency.
> > > In this particular case, I would try creating a branch in > salsa, put experimental in the changelog, and use something > like this: > > Build-Depends: gettext (>= 0.23), autopoint (>= 0.23) I also added Build-Depends: gettext-base (>= 0.23) to test. > > Maybe that way Salsa CI can tell you if the package will > work with gettext 0.23.x or not. > > If you try that, I would be curious to know the outcome. It' passed: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/gtkhash/-/jobs/6880795 > > (Naturally, we don't want those special build-depends > for the unstable version, it would be only a trick to force > build-dependencies from experimental). Yes, I'll upload to unstable, not use Build-Depends: (>= 0.23). > > Thanks. > -- 肖盛文 xiao sheng wen -- Debian Developer(atzlinux) Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=atzlinux%40debian.org Debian salsa: https://salsa.debian.org/atzlinux-guest GnuPG Public Key: 0x00186602339240CB
OpenPGP_0x00186602339240CB.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
