also sprach Sven Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.06.13.1226 +0200]: > Regarding the Bug mentioned in the subject: You marked it upstream, does > that mean you already reported that bug to upstream?
No, just that it applies to the upstream code, not the debian packaging. I did not mark the bug as forwarded. > In any case: Could you provide me with a small set of named > config/zone-files that produces the problem you have? I never used > includes in my named config or zone files, so I actually don't > even know how bind handles them. I might be able to produce > a patch or a preprocessor to handle includes while upstream works > on a cleaner solution. I have purged all my BIND files in a fit of rage [0], but the default bind9 installation uses them. 0. http://blog.madduck.net/geek/2006.06.10-dns-servers > Regarding the other bug (default configuration filename), I fixed that > in my SVN already, it will be included in the next upload. thx. -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list! .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' : proud Debian developer and author: http://debiansystem.info `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)
