| Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | | > Hi, | > | > > > This patch has been on queue for long time: | > > > | > > > http://bugs.donarmstrong.com/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=354972 | > > > | > > > What' the status of it? | > | > Yeek. This patch is rather intrusive. debian-readme might sound | > intuitive, but it's in fact not intuitive, since readme-debian is a | > map of what the files it's supposed to edit are: README.Debian. | > | > And the change is rather dramatic, isn't it? | | I guess. But someone is ore likely to do `M-x debian[TAB]' and find it | than `M-x readme[TAB]'. It's up to you, but please close the bug it you | reject it.
That was also mu reasoning. Common namespace debian-* is much more clear and won't clash on future Emacs packages. It also makes searching things more "The Emacs way". Jari | > > I was letting Junichi take care of all issues relative to this file, | > > since he is the author and has CVS access. I'll let him answer, but I | > > think your suggestion is a good idea. | > > | > > There's also this one to look at: | > > | > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=364234 | > | > Humph, thanks. | > | > considering | > http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/functions/strftime.html | > | > and considering xemacs help for format-time-string claims: | > The number of options reflects the `strftime' function. | > | > that's a bug on xemacs... | | :-) | | Might still take a long time to get fixed if you choose to not work | around it. Up to you. Please reassign the bug to xemacs if you decide | to go that route. | | > I probably now need to find out why I'm not subscribed to this package | > through PTS. | | Good stuff. Thanks! | | -- | Peter | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
