Hello Christoph,
Am Tue, Apr 29, 2025 at 08:29:22AM +0200 schrieb Christoph Biedl:
> Control: tags 1104315 moreinfo -patch
> 
> Helge Kreutzmann wrote...
> 
> > Dear Debian file maintainer,
> > the manpage-l10n project[1] maintains a large number of translations of
> > man pages both from a large variety of sources (including file) as
> > well for a large variety of target languages.
> 
> Allow me being blunt: The story *how* a particular issue was found is
> often a bit interesting - we're still human beings after all - but in
> general not much more than a bit. So my suggestion, keep this short.

Acknowledged, however, often I was asked the opposite, to be more
verbose and explaining the background.

> > I'm now reporting the issues for your project. If future reports
> > should use another channel, please let me know.
> 
> BTS is fine, keep it this way.
> 
> > Man page: file.1
> > Issue:    file → <.NM>
> > 
> > "E<.Em Note:> This Debian version of file was built without seccomp 
> > support, "
> > "so this option has no effect."
> 
> This however leaves me in the void. You tagged the report "patch" which
> in my opinion is acceptable even if it's just a description of the
> proposed change, not something to be fed to patch(1) - however from the
> above I cannot see what is supposed to be different.

The "patch" askes to replace the word "file" with the string "<.NM>". 

I assume this was the man page is again consistent, this is why the
respective translator flagged it this way.

If you don't agree, perfectly fine, then I mark this in our sources so 
it will not be reported again.

Greetings

         Helge

-- 
      Dr. Helge Kreutzmann                     [email protected]
           Dipl.-Phys.                   http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
        64bit GNU powered                     gpg signed mail preferred
           Help keep free software "libre": http://www.ffii.de/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to