On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 06:58:06PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote: > severity #297603 wishlist > tags #297603 confirmed > thanks > > On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 04:29:03AM +1100, Anand Kumria wrote: > > It'd be good if the rules in 30_exim4-config_check_rcpt were uncommented > > and instead guarded with a .ifndef DC_minimaldns / .endif > > > > The rules I am speaking of are 'Deny unless sender address can be > > verified' and 'Warn if the sender host does not have valid reverse DNS'. > > Uncommenting and masking them with ifdef/endif is a nice idea, and I > will try to remember doing so whenever a configuration file is changed > anyway. This will allow local admins to choose their own feature set > without having to edit the actual config file itself, thus preserving > the debconf magic. > > I won't, however, couple sender deny rules to any debconf question > since I don't like having the Debian exim 4 configuration reject > messages by default. This is a can of worms, and I'd rather refrain > from touching it.
"any debconf question"? I was just about to suggest that you have a DC_senderverify question (default to 'no', priority low) coupled with appropriate .ifndef DC_senderverify / .endif for 'No verifiable sender address in message headers' Anand -- linux.conf.au 2005 - http://lca2005.linux.org.au/ - Birthplace of Tux April 18th to 23rd - http://lca2005.linux.org.au/ - LINUX Canberra, Australia - http://lca2005.linux.org.au/ - Get bitten! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
