On 24 July 2025 at 19:47, Santiago Vila wrote: | Package: src:quantlib | Version: 1.39-1 | Severity: serious | Control: affects -1 src:quantlib-swig
These two go in pairs: I only uploaded quantlib 1.39 yesterday so quantlib-swig 1.39 to follow today. Dirk | Dear maintainer: | | During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, package src:quantlib-swig | failed to build from source. There are build logs available here: | | https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/arm64/quantlib-swig.html | | I did a debbisect and this is what I found: | | bisection finished successfully | last good timestamp: 20250723T143535Z | first bad timestamp: 20250723T202938Z | the following packages differ between the last good and first bad timestamp: | libquantlib0-dev 1.38-1 -> 1.39-1 | libquantlib0v5 1.38-1 -> 1.39-1 | | I'm filing this bug mainly to ensure that src:quantlib does | not propagate to testing while src:quantlib-swig is still unfixed. | | As I see that you maintain both packages, if you prefer to consider this issue | as a bug in src:quantlib-swig, please file a new bug and do not close this one | until it's safe to do so (preferably after the release of trixie). | | Note: I am aware that this is a little bit artificial. The good way to prevent | bad packages from propagating to testing is to use autopkgtests. | | Thanks. -- dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | [email protected]
