also sprach Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.06.21.1527 +0200]: > This is apparently by design: > > return updated ? 0 : 1; > > What does it break? Why is it a bug?
Any script that uses set -e (all of mine do). Now I have to explicitly check return code to determine whether there was an error. I'd say it's a bug because there's no error. Moreover, by the time freshclam finishes, what does it matter whether it was updated or not? -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list! .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' : proud Debian developer and author: http://debiansystem.info `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)
