On Fri, 31 May 2024 23:58:21 +0100 Richard Lewis
<[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Oct 2012 17:55:06 +0200 =?utf-8?B?TG/Dr2M=?= Minier
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Package: logcheck
> > Version: 1.3.15
> > Severity: minor
> > Tags: patch
> >
> >         Hi,
> >
> > Got this log from time to time in System Events:
> > Oct 23 13:48:16 pig2 named[28880]: success resolving 
> > '26.0/25.218.183.203.in-addr.arpa/PTR' (in 
> > '0/25.218.183.203.in-addr.arpa'?) after reducing the advertised EDNS UDP 
> > packet size to 512 octets
> >
> > Changing the regexp for the "(in '...'?)" part from:
> > ^[[:alpha:]]{3} [ :[:digit:]]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ named\[[0-9]+\]: success 
> > resolving '[^[:space:]]+' \(in '[.[:alnum:]-]+'\?\) after (disabling 
> > EDNS|reducing the advertised EDNS UDP packet size to 512 octets)$
> > to:
> > ^[[:alpha:]]{3} [ :[:digit:]]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ named\[[0-9]+\]: success 
> > resolving '[^[:space:]]+' \(in '[/.[:alnum:]-]+'\?\) after (disabling 
> > EDNS|reducing the advertised EDNS UDP packet size to 512 octets)$
> >
>
>
> It's a shame no-one replied to this bug from 2012.
>
> A lot has changed in that time, and eg EDNS is now more common- i do
> remember seeing messages like this in the past, and adding locla
> rules, but i  unless i am missing something i dont see these
> messages at all in journal or bind.log today, so perhaps this bug can be 
> closed.
>
>  (i may well be missing something  - if these are in fact common then
> we should definitely filter them as there's not much you can do!)

A year later: closing, as no-one is arguing for a fix. I suspect this
is an old message, but please reopen if there is something to do in
trixie

Reply via email to