Ian Jackson writes ("Re: [tag2upload 529] failed, cage 0.2.0+20250816-1"):
> Hi. I saw this and investigated:
>
> Debian tag2upload service writes ("[tag2upload 529] failed, cage
> 0.2.0+20250816-1"):
> ...
> > builder:work$ git fetch origin --no-tags
> > 'refs/tags/debian/0.2.0+20250816-1:refs/tags/debian/0.2.0+20250816-1'
> > 'refs/tags/upstream/0.2.0+20250816:refs/tags/upstream/0.2.0+20250816'
> > fatal: couldn't find remote ref refs/tags/upstream/0.2.0+20250816
> > t2u processor [dgit-repos-server]: failed command: ./ssh-builder
> > '[email protected]' 'env -C
> > /tmp/autopkgtest-virt-docker.shared.lqkafdxw/downtmp/work git fetch origin
> > --no-tags
> > '\''refs/tags/debian/0.2.0+20250816-1:refs/tags/debian/0.2.0+20250816-1'\''
> > '\''refs/tags/upstream/0.2.0+20250816:refs/tags/upstream/0.2.0+20250816'\'''
>
> I looked at the logs. I can see in our debug log:
>
> 2025-08-16T13:32:55.066031Z debian/ tag created, job 529
> 2025-08-16T13:32:55.070689Z service starts work
> 2025-08-16T13:33:13.349728Z failed, sent this email
> 2025-08-16T13:34:45.507584Z upstream/ tag created
> 2025-08-16T13:37:23.286918Z debian/ tag deleted
> 2025-08-16T13:37:37.092350Z debian/ tag recreated, job 530, but duplicate
>
> The service will only ever process each tag once. You'll be able to
> get this to work by adding a new changelog stanza, I think.
> (See under "Notes and advice" in the wiki).
>
> I think git-debpush ought to have done better here. I will file a
> bug.
Hi again. I realise this was a week ago now, but:
I filed #1111305, thinking that it git-debpush had erroneously failed
to push the debian/ tag. But now that I look at the code it seems to
do the thing I was accusing it of not doing. I wrote a test case and
it passes:
https://salsa.debian.org/dgit-team/dgit/-/merge_requests/303
Is it possible that you used git-debpush --tag-only, and then manually
pushed the debian/ tag ?
Regards,
Ian.
--
Ian Jackson <[email protected]> These opinions are my own.
Pronouns: they/he. If I emailed you from @fyvzl.net or @evade.org.uk,
that is a private address which bypasses my fierce spamfilter.
