Hi,

On 30-08-2025 09:55, Andreas Tille wrote:
and I felt his actions weren't really
appropriate given my feedback (from memory, I didn't check what I wrote).

I understood: We should deal with all festvox-* packages the same and
thus my current offer is to create a repository for all of them.  If
this is a misinterpretation of what you wrote please be more verbose.


Now having read some of the thread again, my *first* reaction was indeed: all packages the same. But that was before youpi pointed out that we decided in the past to have the repos on the dgit server (and this one just missed the VCS-* lines). I did note in my reply to that that the dgit approach had my preference:

> 1) we can set the vcs-git line to that (my preference at this moment)

where the part between brackets appears to have been ignored. That's where my "unheard" feeling comes from.

Paul

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to