Hi!

Sorry for delay with reply.

On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 01:47:10AM -0300, Martín Ferrari wrote:
> I'm in the process of adopting the vtun package, and closing its current 
> bugs.
> 
> Regarding your report and patch, I need to clear a doubt, since I'm no
> expert in the field. It seems to me that your patch would make vtun
> use the compatability routine which uses open directly to /dev/ptyXY,
> and I think that those are legacy PTYs. From what I read in the
> getpt() man page, getpt -or posix_openpt- is the correct way to open
> unix98 ptys.
> 
> Can you comment on this?

No, my patch does not disable anything. It just _enables_ autoconf check
for legacy/unix ptys.

vtun-2.6/config.h.in is a file to be changed by configure (really, a file
to be used when config.h is created). If config.h.in has not entries for
HAVE_GETPT,HAVE_GRANTPT,etc, they will not be defined after configure run.
When I add these #undef's, configure changes them to #defines if unix98
pty's are supported.

Regards,
    Sasha.
-- 
Alexandra N. Kossovsky
OKTET Labs (http://www.oktetlabs.ru/)
Phones: +7(812)956-42-86(mobile) +7(812)428-67-09(office)
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to