On Mon, 15 Sep 2025, Nilesh Patra wrote:

>But why should it be omitted? I think moving it to info should be good
>enough to do here -- we would like to encourage maintainers to move to
>a newer watch version eventually.

It’s likely fatal if they upgrade prematurely, though.

(And, perhaps I was a bit angry, but recent lintian churn has
been immense every time it got updated… this is getting on the
nerves of all package maintainers…)

Reply via email to