On Sun, Sep 21, 2025 at 11:23:12AM +0200, Christopher Zimmermann wrote: > > I just switched my root partition from ext2 to nilfs2 (is this a bad > idea?!?).
Well, there hasn't been zero upstream development, but the most recent git commit for nilfs-utils (the upstream sources for nilfs-tools) is April 3rd, 2024. I am seeing almost no activity on the mailing list; people are sending patches which are cc'ed to the linux-nilfs mailing list, but I'm not seeing a replies from the maintainer. There is *some* activity on the git tree; a few commits in July and April of this year. But it doesn't look like it's under active development. The weird thing is that supposedly there are hints that there was the beginning of an fsck for nilfs in 2008(!), but it was never merged into the git tree: https://linux-nilfs.vger.kernel.narkive.com/w0lqFaoH/can-t-mount-nilfs-error-searching-super-root So as to whether it's a bad idea --- without a file system repair tool, if your file system gets corrupted by either a kernel bug or a hardware problem --- you might not be able to recover the file system. So your only alternative might be to reformat the disk and restore from backups. It does seem very odd that a file system which was introduced in 2005 (over 20 years ago!) doesn't have an tool to either repair the file system, or even determine if it might be corrupted in some way. So I'm not sure I could in good honesty recommend the use of nilfs to users. And if they use it, I'd strongly recommend that are making very frequent backups, since there is no guaratee that if the file system gets corrupted, you might not be able to mount it, and that might result in complete data loss. Cheers, - Ted
