Package: lsb-base Version: 11.6 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate *** * What led up to the situation? Tried to run my licensed program "Maple". License verification failed. * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or ineffective)? Waterloo Maple Software technical support said their license manager (and most other licensed programs' managers) will not work without lsb-base being installed. They recommended installing it. They also recommended ln -s /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 /lib64/ld-lsb-x86-64.so.3 but this appears not to be necessary. * What was the outcome of this action? Maple's license verification started working. * What outcome did you expect instead? I expected it to work without needing to install a package that is a default part of most distributions. It should be a default part of Debian installations. -- System Information: Debian Release: 13.1 APT prefers stable-updates APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable-security'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 6.12.43+deb13-amd64 (SMP w/32 CPU threads; PREEMPT) Kernel taint flags: TAINT_DIE Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) LSM: AppArmor: enabled Versions of packages lsb-base depends on: ii sysvinit-utils 3.14-4 lsb-base recommends no packages. lsb-base suggests no packages. -- no debconf information
