The repository has been archived upstream prematurely because it's still used. If we 
limit ourselves to ZODB (which I only care), there is the following dependency chain: 
ZEO -> zdaemon -[test]-> zc.customdoctests

There's an upstream issue: https://github.com/zopefoundation/zdaemon/issues/39

---

I am the main developer of https://lab.nexedi.com/nexedi/neoppod , which is a 
storage implementation for ZODB, and I am still interested in having ZODB in 
Debian, because I find it's an underrated database. I'd also include ZEO 
because it can be useful for a ZODB user and it should be cheap to have (apart 
from zdeamon#39).

I don't want to detail here & now why I stopped my work on ZODB, and hopefully 
I could resume in a few months. Let's say that spending extra time on reintroducing 
removed packages is not encouraging.

About zc.customdoctests, I must admit I have no direct interest in zdaemon and 
it's not me who'll help to fix #39 or fork zc.customdoctests (e.g. to adapt for 
new Zope namespace). So realistically, I can hardly defend it, except as long 
as it's not an obstacle to Debian.

But for zodbpickle, it's different and I wish I reacted quickly enough to hold 
off its removal.

Julien

Reply via email to