la 4.10.2025 klo 18.14 Thorsten Glaser ([email protected]) kirjoitti: > > On Mon, 7 Jul 2025, Martin-Éric Racine wrote: > > >I'm not sure whether changing this behavior is remotely desirable. > >However, I do agree that if this makes ifupdown presume that an > >external IP has succesfully been acquired and the boot process continue > >to steps that launch network-dependant services, it is problematic. > > I’m just interested in having the ability to remove this regression > against isc-dhcp-client. If there are use(r)s of dhcpcd-base for > which this backgrounding and dynamic switching is desired, then by > all means let them use it, but provide options. > > I had to look up what IPv4LL/IP4LL even is (RFC 3927), and I can > say with confidence that, when I configure an interface to use DHCP, > I *never* want IPv4LL.
Just add the following option to the configuration file: noipv4ll > And as things are, both the backgounding and the addition of IPv4LL > are regressions that occur when using just the line… They don't remotely count as regressions. You cannot expect any software to be drop-in replacements. There's always gonna be small differences. Martin-Éric
