Hi, On 17 Oct 2025 at 09:18:36, Enrico Rossi wrote: > Hi, > > better the virtual package time-daemon ?
yes, I think so! time-daemon seems good and aligned with the existing packages that I can see. > Cheers, > > E. > > On Fri, Oct 17, 2025 at 07:31:14AM +0200, Carles Pina i Estany wrote: > > Dear maintainer, > > > > I see that the package tucnak (version 4.67-1) suggests ntp and ntpdate > > which are not in unstable. > > > > This can be seen in https://packages.debian.org/unstable/tucnak . Search > > for "Package not available". > > > > The missing packages used to be in Debian but they were removed some > > time ago: > > > > - https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/ntp > > - https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/ntpdate > > > > Should they be dropped or changed? Should it suggest something else such > > as systemd-timesyncd? chrony? > > > > Thank you, > > -- > GPG key: 4096R/5E0195FAF2133176 2010-10-19 Enrico Rossi > <[email protected]> -- Carles Pina i Estany https://carles.pina.cat | [email protected] | [email protected]
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
