On Sun, 25 Jun 2006, Lars Wirzenius wrote: > > If, and *only* if all other usage of invoke-rc.d with a path is also > > forbidden, then yes. I mean in all maintainer packages, which also means an > > lintian check, etc. > > I'm not sure I understand, sorry. Why would use of explicit path to run > invoke-rc.d be interesting at all? If you meant that use of path to run
It is not that it is interesting, it is that if we don't do so in some places, and do it in others, you will never know which invoke-rc.d will be called. I have absolutely nothing against not giving a full path to invoke-rc.d invocations, it is just that we need to fix this everywhere for it to have any good effect... -- "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot Henrique Holschuh -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
