Hi David,
were you able to make any progress in packaging an update?
Regards,
Lee
On Thu, 31 Jul 2025 20:22:37 -0300 David Tadokoro <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi once again, Lee
You are right, it has been quite some time since kworkflow has been
updated. As I mentioned in the reply to bug #1110187, I am close to open
a MR updating the package, and aim to keep maintaining it after that.
Thank you for the report,
David
On Thu, 31 Jul 2025 15:38:45 +0200 Lee Garrett <[email protected]> wrote:
> Source: kworkflow
> Version: 20191112-1.2
> Severity: normal
> X-Debbugs-Cc: [email protected]
>
> Hi,
>
> there only seems to be an initial upload by the maintainer to close the ITP, and
> after that there are only two NMUs. The package itself has not been updated
in 6
> years, despite upstream having done many release it that time. Maybe it's time
> to either pass it on to a new maintainer or remove it?
>
> Regards,
> Lee
>
>
> -- System Information:
> Debian Release: 13.0
> APT prefers testing-security
> APT policy: (990, 'testing-security'), (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable')
> Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
>
> Kernel: Linux 6.12.35+deb13-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
> Kernel taint flags: TAINT_OOT_MODULE, TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE
> Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not
set
> Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
> Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
> LSM: AppArmor: enabled
>
>
