On Sat, Nov 01, 2025 at 10:48:25AM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote: > I treat failures that do happen on non-official buildds as non-RC
Why? > > I understand that debugging the failing test might take time and > > effort, but if you are not willing to debug it, which is ok, then > > please at least disable or skip it, which should not be difficult. > > If you looked at the referenced other bug report you would have noticed that > the issue has been debugged and sent upstream. > So I find your statement rather insulting and condescending when it's > apparently you who didn't spend the time to read #1100103 Sorry for the misunderstanding. By "debugging" I really meant "actually findind a fix" (which did not happen in #1100103). We don't know when (if at all) upstream will offer a fix. Some people who try to build the package with enough disk space and enough memory (i.e. not doing anything "wrong") can't build the package reliably. This is why I suggest to disable the test in the meantime. Thanks.
