On Fri, Nov 14, 2025 at 02:43:54PM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 14/11/2025 14:23, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote: > > Hi Emilio, Laszlo, > > > > * Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <[email protected]> [251114 12:12]: > > > On Tue, 13 Aug 2024 20:05:15 +0200 Chris Hofstaedtler <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > Source: fuse > > > > Version: 2.9.9-8.1 > > > > Severity: normal > > > > > > > > fuse (2.x) and fuse3 are not coninstallable. fuse 2.x should > > > > probably go away. > > > > > > > > Tracking bug for this. > > > > > > Should every rdep bug block this one? > > > > Thank you for the suggestion. They now do so. > > > > I'm wondering if we should start bumping the severity of these bugs, > > so we can remove fuse2. > > That sounds reasonable, and if done early, there will be more time for > maintainers to fix the bugs.
Let me know when you think it'd be a good time, to not disturb something more important. > AFAICS of the 45 remaining affected packages (ignoring sid-only packages), > only apt-cacher-ng is a key package. Best, Chris
