Package: mergerfs
Version: 2.41.0
Severity: wishlist
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
Looking to get v2.41.0 through to unstable for testing.
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
ineffective)?
* What was the outcome of this action?
* What outcome did you expect instead?
*** End of the template - remove these template lines ***
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 13.1
APT prefers stable-security
APT policy: (500, 'stable-security'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 6.12.48+deb13-amd64 (SMP w/16 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_PROPRIETARY_MODULE, TAINT_USER, TAINT_OOT_MODULE
Locale: LANG=en_AU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_AU.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8),
LANGUAGE=en_AU:en
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled
Versions of packages mergerfs depends on:
ii fuse 3.17.2-3
ii fuse3 [fuse] 3.17.2-3
ii libc6 2.41-12
ii libgcc-s1 14.2.0-19
ii libstdc++6 14.2.0-19
mergerfs recommends no packages.
mergerfs suggests no packages.
-- no debconf information
