On Wednesday, November 19, 2025 6:23:59 PM Mountain Standard Time Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues wrote: > you will end up uploading something else than you told sbuild to build. sbuild > was building the dsc that got copied in (the one produced on the outside) but > what you are uploading is the dsc which sbuild produced. And secondly, you > are loosing your input as sbuild will overwrite it with the new build > artifacts it created.
In what was would the .dsc be different? Shouldn’t they be generated with identical information both times? > > > I think I understand your problem now. Your problem is, that you do not > > > get > > > a *_$arch.changes file which includes references to the source package and > > > adding the --source option or $build_source=1 does this and that's why you > > > recommend adding it. Is that correct? > > > > That is correct. Properly generating complete source.changes and > > $arch.changes files is an important aspect of the example .sbuildrc on the > > wiki. > > Would the $both_changes=1 option in your ~/.config/sbuild/config.pl do what > you want? Use the patch of this MR: > https://salsa.debian.org/debian/sbuild/-/merge_requests/211 Yes, it looks like that patch would address all my concerns. -- Soren Stoutner [email protected]
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
