dear patrick, [email protected] has me thinking that #1124301: sddm: offers sddm+lightdm without unabbreviating sddm nor > offering twm+xmonad > has been closed by Patrick Franz <[email protected]>. > Their explanation is attached below along with your original report. > If this explanation is unsatisfactory and you have not received a > better one in a separate message then please contact Patrick Franz < > [email protected]> by > replying to this email.
and the explanation is an empty string which i perceive as without explanation thus feeling like a violation of the debian social contract that we will never hide any shortcomings hence i beg for some -reopen and perhaps -reassign where appropriate until true satisfaction of this misery is achieved neither freezing systems into unresponsiveness nor hindering mitigations seem acceptable to my users sincerely yours zebra face czyborra Op di 30 dec 2025 om 11:25 schreef Debian Bug Tracking System < [email protected]>: > This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report > which was filed against the sddm package: > > #1124301: sddm: offers sddm+lightdm without unabbreviating sddm nor > offering twm+xmonad > > It has been closed by Patrick Franz <[email protected]>. > > Their explanation is attached below along with your original report. > If this explanation is unsatisfactory and you have not received a > better one in a separate message then please contact Patrick Franz < > [email protected]> by > replying to this email. > > > -- > 1124301: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1124301 > Debian Bug Tracking System > Contact [email protected] with problems > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Patrick Franz <[email protected]> > To: > Cc: [email protected] > Bcc: > Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2025 11:15:49 +0100 > Subject: Re: Bug#1124301: sddm: offers sddm+lightdm without unabbreviating > sddm nor offering twm+xmonad > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: "🦓" <[email protected]> > To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[email protected]> > Cc: > Bcc: > Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2025 09:51:26 +0100 > Subject: sddm: offers sddm+lightdm without unabbreviating sddm nor > offering twm+xmonad > Package: sddm > Version: 0.20.0-2ubuntu4.2 > Severity: minor > Tags: a11y newcomer > X-Debbugs-Cc: [email protected] > > when i find the time for it, i shall file a separate reportbug on cinnamon > & firefox-bin & forkserver freezing my bootstrapped by pierre linuxmint > 22.2 debian gnu linux on my latest acer aspire go 15 workstation while all > 3 of > them read and write unnecessary terabytes someplace according to > gnome-system-monitor coincident with some javascripts from meta and > microsoft if not even alphabet incorporated. > > to mitigate those inacceptable hangs i tried to replace cinnamon & firefox > & chromium and install something kissier but cinnamon does not seem to > yield gracefully to a simple aptitude install twm xmonad nor a killall > cinnamon but > tasksel xfce lxqt does come closer to replacing cinnamon since we needa > unbloat da system! > > tasksels dpkg-reconfigure sddm gives me a pro choice of lightdm+sddm but > refrains from enlightening me which is what for and i m too lazy to SIGTSTP > the install for firing an educative aptitude show sddm as if i were in an > install console where i have no parallel ttys either and do consider it > the installer's responsibility to not wreck my windowing. > > sddm maintainer [email protected] so far got closest > to a functioning update-alternatives default-x-display-manager which is why > you are the one i now beg to insert twm+xmonad in2 ur lightdm+xddm menu by > either > amending packages.debian.org/sddm or lobbying the maintainers of other > display-managers to fulfil their obligations. > > cordial thanks for all your leading us hither and progressing even further! >
