Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > A binary package that's unusable on the architecture it's built for is > 'grave'. An arch: all package (like balazar) that isn't usable on one > particular arch may be serious (if the maintainer thinks it's a blocker for > the release), or it may be important, or it may be wishlist...
If so, there no more possibility to differenciate a binary package built for all arches which crash on *ALL* architecture, and is really unusuable, and one which is having problems with a specific architecture. I cannot see how i should be considering soya "unusable or mostly so" when it works perfectly on so much architectures... Btw, if nobody really helps, i'd remove support for amd64 before release. I see no reason to have Slune and Balazar (and the coming Balazar Brothers) to be removed from the archive for this. -- Marc Dequènes (Duck)
pgpyLndjykEnd.pgp
Description: PGP signature
